In the process of certification the IUCI holds to the standard practice of involving of experienced and highly professional experts. The list of participants of the expert commission in every case must ensure the optimal combination of the necessary theoretical knowledge and practical skills.

 

Persons invited to the expert groups:

  •  in categories of expertise 1-2.

Experts from the list of members or partners of the union + specialists in the field of economics, management, trade, sociology, psychology, technology, provided by the International Academy of Science and Higher Education (IASHE; London, UK).

  •  in categories of expertise 3-4.

Experts from the list of members or partners of the union + specialists in the field of economics, management, trade, sociology, psychology, technology, provided by the IASHE + scientists from the leading universities of the world + experts and specialists of foreign companies.

  •  in categories of expertise 5-7.

Experts from the list of members or partners of the union + specialists in the field of economics, management, trade, sociology, psychology, technology, provided by the IASHE + experts and specialists of major specialized companies +  leading scientists in the field of physics, chemistry, technology, trade, management and other branches + experts from Chambers of Commerce and Industry from around the world - experts from national and international commodity and raw materials exchanges.

 

General mechanism of organization of work with experts:

a) remote expertise: 

  • conclusion of the contract between the union and the expert;
  • invitation and instructions, related to the participation in the expertise are sent via email;
  • detailed briefing concerning the participation in the expertise (terms, mechanisms, criteria of documentation) can be found in the personal cabinet of the expert on the website;
  • after the confirmation of participation in the expertise, the expert, within the remote expertise (category of expert assessment 1-4), receives all the necessary materials (via email and by post) - for conduction of the expert analysis;
  • during all the term of remote expert assessment, experts are not informed about the list of experts involved, they formulate their conclusions independently;
  • as the control term is reached, the expert sends his conclusions to the union by post or via email (according to the task he was given);
  • after all the opinions of the expert commission members are received and fixed, for a period of time the union presents them to each other and gives the opportunity to discuss the results of the expertise on the closed forum on the website;
  • following the results of the discussion, every expert has the right to change the earlier given marks but not more than 2 points, he also has the right to fix the separate opinion in the expert conclusion;
  • preliminary agreement of experts, their previously coordinated non-objectivity or violation of the established procedure of the expertise holding, leads to the cancellation of the contract with the relevant expert and bringing him to the relevant liability.

b) expertise with presence:

  • after the approval of participation in the expertise, for conducting the expertise with presence (category of expert assessment 5-7) the expert receives all the necessary materials (by post or via email) for preparation to the expert analysis;
  • experts taking part in the real (actual) expertise are not informed about the full list of the expert commission members before coming to the location of expertise;
  • before the expertise, the expert receives money for buying a ticket to reach the location of the expertise holding (he may also receive the previously bought ticket) on his bank account or card;
  • information about the purchasing or receiving a ticket, as well as the date, place and time of arrival is sent to the union by the expert;
  • the expert commission curator meets the expert;
  • while conducting the expert analysis on all criteria of the expertise, the experts are absolutely independent in their conclusions and individually formulate their expert conclusions;
  • after all the opinions of the expert commission members are received and fixed, for a period of time the union presents them to each other and gives the opportunity to discuss the results of the expertise on the collegial meeting;
  • following the results of the discussion, every expert has the right to change the earlier given marks but not more than 2 points, he also has the right to fix the separate opinion in the expert conclusion;
  • preliminary agreement of experts, their previously coordinated non-objectivity or violation of the established procedure of the expertise holding, leads to the cancellation of the contract with the relevant expert and bringing him to the relevant liability.

Remuneration of the expert work and compensation of their expenditures

From amounts, transferred to accounts of the union by the customer of expertise, in accordance with the stated grid of tariffs presented in the personal contract of every expert, the union transfers the following amounts to the bank account of the expert in the piecework mode:

a) before the holding of expertise:

  • the difference payment, stated in the contract;
  • necessary payments for a ticket and some other necessary expenditures remuneration;

b) after holding of expertise:

  • the rest of the award stated in the contract;
  • compensation of expenditures, related with the participation of the expert in the expertise (on the basis of the presented bills and acquisition of them by the bookkeeping department of the union).

The best experts may be regularly invited by the union (taking into account the correlation of their specialty and qualification with the object and methods of expert analysis). They also can be transferred from lower categories of experts to higher categories (permission to participate in assessments of various categories). More frequent participation in expert work as well as participation in assessments of higher category of expert analysis, provide the relevant expert with higher payments.

 

The following number of experts takes part in expert assessments: 

  •  in categories of expertise 1-2 – 2-3 experts, presenting not less than 2 countries;
  •  in categories of expertise 3-4 - 3-5 experts, presenting not less than 3 countries;
  •  in categories of expertise 5-6 - 4-6 experts, presenting not less than 4 countries;
  •  in categories of expertise 7 - 5-10 experts, presenting not less than 5 countries.